The Phoenix an Illustrated Review of Occultism and Philosophy Pdf
This is an interesting booklet, simply i cannot requite this a good rating for several reasons. Get-go of all, i would like to say that it's good for a student to become as many perspectives every bit possible on tarot, and this does nowadays some interesting points. It explores each of the 22 major arcana in a narrative form and some interesting ideas well-nigh esoteric teachings of tarot are presented. However, this text reproduces a lot of the false history of tarot that originated with Court de Gebelin about the cards being a survival of ancient Egyptian wisdom (i.due east. The legendary Book of Thoth). While i think such legends and traditional stories are interesting, they are not accurate. So, books like this continue the spread of inaccurate information in the occult community. Also, this is not long enough to be considered a "book." It's more like an article. And so, be sure and look at how many pages before you decide to buy information technology--supposing yous're purchasing online and may not exist aware of how short the text is. That's really my chief issue is that it's so short and superficial a look at tarot. It only actually addresses the meanings of the 22 major arcana and that only in a very superficial narrative form that doesn't tell us much. In determination, i call up this is a very interesting read, and it'south good to see all unlike perspectives on a subject, only i cannot recommend this book or requite information technology a good rating because information technology's too short, incomplete, superficial, and has some inaccurate information it perpetuates.
In spite of being specific to the Rider Waite deck, the symbolic attributes and conceptual caption of the the Tarot that Ouspensky delivers on this booklet is really comprehensive and clear. Totally recommended for beginners or anyone trying to form a general concept of the major arcana
I really like the descriptions of the cards and the way he breaks down the suites was very helpful. A quick read, less than sixty pages. I wouldn't plough to this for an introduction to Tarot but I call up it enhanced my understanding and interpretation of the cards equally a narrative. three stars.
Picked up this one because Jodorowsky in 1 of his youtube tarot readings mentioned it as a book that really formed him. It's a nice reference material, just a small pamphlet that provides a pathworking-style expect into the mystical aspects of the cards
Un'introduzione meravigliosa e una prima parte anche. La seconda, con un viaggio sui generis negli arcani, per me meno bella. Ma profondo e intenso.
É um ótimo livro para iniciantes na arte do tarô
A good book to dilate cognition on this discipline.
This is an interesting but problematic trivial tarot guide written by Ouspensky, prior to his involvement with Gurdjieff (if I sympathize correctly). On the broadest, well-nigh basic level, I am not sure I can recommend this as a guide for beginners or those in need of a resource for carte du jour meanings. Ouspensky only covers the Major Arcana in any detail, and his basic breakdown of the card meanings is too full general and in some cases questionable. His brief breakdown of the Minor Arcana elements is too problematic, and he doesn't really touch on the implied meanings of numbers and royals. The more extended meanings of the cards are treated in a narrative fashion, which is a wonderful technique in terms of reading and interacting with the cards, simply isn't going to detail the specific symbolism used. Ouspensky undoubtedly refers to the Passenger-Waite tarot, which consciously borrows elements from several traditions and is quite specific in terms of meaning. While I support more intuitive approaches to the tarot and take institute that approach personally quite liberating, decks like the Rider-Waite or Thoth are constructed in such an intentional way that it is useful to sympathise the reference points and grounding system. According to editor Donald Tyson in his notes, Ouspensky might also be making reference to Wirth'southward tarot, which is essentially just a modernized form of the early Renaissance tarot decks like the well-known Marseilles tarot. These very probably aren't making the same references, or are at to the lowest degree non grounded in modernistic magick/occult systems. Merely then this bring us to the adjacent issue with the book, which is that the text is rife with misinformation about tarot that is nevertheless getting repeated nearly 100 years later on. Most notably, the idea started in the 18th century by Antoine Courtroom that the tarot originally came from Egypt, along with the idea that tarot was brought to Europe by Gypsies. None of this is supported past factual evidence, and it is more likely that tarot began equally a card game influenced by similar games going further back in Cathay and India. This, of course, doesn't mean that there isn't inherent symbolism in the cards, it's simply not some hidden knowledge from occult societies in Ancient Arab republic of egypt and whatever current occult implications have been pasted on by folks since. I'm not going to particular the residual of the data, as editor Donald Tyson in my edition does a great job qualifying Ouspensky's statements in his notes. If you can find this detail edition, I recommend it. Returning to my betoken regarding the narrative approach used past Ouspensky, I will say that this is the greatest signal of interest in the volume. As I said earlier, he doesn't really delve into all the symbols, and many readers will find the out-of-order sequence hard to work with as a resource. However, those unfamiliar with this technique will detect it very interesting and hopefully be able to apply the thought to their study of the cards. Mary One thousand. Greer uses some similar exercises in her Tarot for Your Cocky, directing you through the process, which Ouspensky sadly does non do. Merely the thoughtful reader with a deep interest in using tarot for self-work will no doubt find the demonstration of this method quite useful. The connections he is able to make from card to card to create a continuous narrative might even help those applying tarot to the writing of fiction. The numbering organization he lays out is quite interesting and worth exploring, though I wish he'd used it to organize the demonstration. Withal, I program on playing around with the arrangement he proposes and see what I tin glean from it. In conclusion, while I have some pretty potent criticisms of the content hither, I did find much of it interesting and worth the read. It didn't introduce me to much I was non already aware of, and I don't recommend information technology to beginners or anyone looking for another tarot guide that will interruption the meaning and symbolism down in a clear fashion. With the Rider-Waite specifically, y'all're probably better off picking up Alan Oken's Pocket Guide... or reading Waite's own Pictorial Primal (if you can stand up the Victorian circumlocution). Mary Grand. Greer is another writer on tarot I highly recommend, and she covers more than or less the same method Ouspensky uses in this text, with a more no-nonsense approach.
This is a narrative journey through each menu of the major arcana. The conceit of the work is interesting, but very limiting in terms of story telling. Similar trying to tell a coherent story using just a single prototype from each TV station in order, at that place is only so much you can do when your medium is essentially random. Even taking that into account, though, I still think it'southward disappointing. More could exist done with the textile, scant every bit it is.
Displaying ane - 10 of 21 reviews
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/530908.The_Symbolism_of_the_Tarot
0 Response to "The Phoenix an Illustrated Review of Occultism and Philosophy Pdf"
Post a Comment